L.A. Confidential vs Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
L.A. Confidential has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 4.9/10 for Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough). Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough is the shorter watch at 1h 27m compared with 2h 18m. L.A. Confidential is the older of the two (1997 against 2005). Both are crime, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
L.A. Confidential
Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough| L.A. Confidential | Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.8/10 | ★ 4.9/10 |
| Year | 1997 | 2005 |
| Length | 2h 18m | 1h 27m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Crime, Drama, Mystery |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Curtis Hanson | Jay Lowi |
| Main cast | Ron Rifkin, Guy Pearce, Simon Baker, Danny DeVito, Russell Crowe | Linden Ashby, Claire Coffee, Brad Johnson, Eric Fleeks, Dina Meyer |
Synopsis
L.A. Confidential
Three detectives in the corrupt and brutal L.A. police force of the 1950s use differing methods to uncover a conspiracy behind the shotgun slayings of the patrons at an all-night diner.
Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
Two young women will stop at nothing for one to gain a $4 million inheritance of two priceless diamonds, while two detectives try to thwart their plans, but find complications abound.
Where to watch
Where to watch L.A. ConfidentialWhere to watch Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
More like L.A. Confidential · More like Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough · Compare other titles