La La Land vs Never Met Picasso
La La Land has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 4.7/10 for Never Met Picasso). Never Met Picasso is the shorter watch at 1h 41m compared with 2h 9m. Never Met Picasso is the older of the two (1997 against 2016). Both are comedy, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
La La Land
Never Met Picasso| La La Land | Never Met Picasso | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 4.7/10 |
| Year | 2016 | 1997 |
| Length | 2h 9m | 1h 41m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Music, Romance | Comedy, Drama, Romance |
| Country | United States of America | United States of America |
| Director | Damien Chazelle | Stephen Kijak |
| Main cast | Rosemarie DeWitt, Ryan Gosling, J.K. Simmons, Emma Stone, Sonoya Mizuno | Keith David, Margot Kidder, Alexis Arquette, Don McKellar, Richard Snee |
Synopsis
La La Land
Mia, an aspiring actress, serves lattes to movie stars in between auditions and Sebastian, a jazz musician, scrapes by playing cocktail party gigs in dingy bars, but as success mounts they are faced with decisions that begin to fray the fragile fabric of their love affair, and the dreams they worked so hard to maintain in each other threaten to rip them apart.
Never Met Picasso
Still living at home with his avant-garde actress mother, constantly rejected by art schools, and without a lover, aspiring painter Andrew decides to enter a contest in hopes of winning a six month stay in Kenya. Though things aren't great for Andrew, neither are they wonderful for his lesbian friend Lucy who constantly bickers with her lover Ingrid. Lucy complicates Andrew's life when she introduces him to the suspicious-looking, enigmatic…
Where to watch
Where to watch La La LandWhere to watch Never Met Picasso
More like La La Land · More like Never Met Picasso · Compare other titles