La La Land vs Taking Woodstock
La La Land has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 6.2/10 for Taking Woodstock). Taking Woodstock is the shorter watch at 2h compared with 2h 9m. Taking Woodstock is the older of the two (2009 against 2016). Both are comedy, drama, music movies, so they suit a similar mood.
La La Land
Taking Woodstock| La La Land | Taking Woodstock | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 6.2/10 |
| Year | 2016 | 2009 |
| Length | 2h 9m | 2h |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Music, Romance | Comedy, Drama, Music |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Damien Chazelle | Ang Lee |
| Main cast | Rosemarie DeWitt, Ryan Gosling, J.K. Simmons, Emma Stone, Sonoya Mizuno | Jonathan Groff, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Paul Dano, Liev Schreiber, Imelda Staunton |
Synopsis
La La Land
Mia, an aspiring actress, serves lattes to movie stars in between auditions and Sebastian, a jazz musician, scrapes by playing cocktail party gigs in dingy bars, but as success mounts they are faced with decisions that begin to fray the fragile fabric of their love affair, and the dreams they worked so hard to maintain in each other threaten to rip them apart.
Taking Woodstock
The story of Elliot Tiber and his family, who inadvertently played a pivotal role in making the famed Woodstock Music and Arts Festival into the happening that it was. When Elliot hears that a neighboring town has pulled the permit on a hippie music festival, he calls the producers thinking he could drum up some much-needed business for his parents' run-down motel. Three weeks later, half a million people are on their way to his neighbor’s farm…
Where to watch
Where to watch La La LandWhere to watch Taking Woodstock
More like La La Land · More like Taking Woodstock · Compare other titles