La La Land vs Trace of Stones
La La Land has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 6.1/10 for Trace of Stones). La La Land is the shorter watch at 2h 9m compared with 2h 19m. Trace of Stones is the older of the two (1966 against 2016). Both are comedy, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
La La Land
Trace of Stones| La La Land | Trace of Stones | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 6.1/10 |
| Year | 2016 | 1966 |
| Length | 2h 9m | 2h 19m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Music, Romance | Comedy, Drama, Romance |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Damien Chazelle | Frank Beyer |
| Main cast | Rosemarie DeWitt, Ryan Gosling, J.K. Simmons, Emma Stone, Sonoya Mizuno | Hans-Peter Reinecke, Manfred Krug, Krystyna Stypułkowska, Eberhard Esche, Johannes Wieke |
Synopsis
La La Land
Mia, an aspiring actress, serves lattes to movie stars in between auditions and Sebastian, a jazz musician, scrapes by playing cocktail party gigs in dingy bars, but as success mounts they are faced with decisions that begin to fray the fragile fabric of their love affair, and the dreams they worked so hard to maintain in each other threaten to rip them apart.
Trace of Stones
Bad planning and shortages prevail on an East German construction site. Foreman Hannes Balla uses unconventional methods to overcome the problems. New Socialist Unity Party secretary Werner Horrath is charged with bringing the rough-and-ready builder crew into line. The task seems doomed to fail as the two men compete for the affections of young engineer Kati Klee. But when she gets pregnant by married man Horrath, he is in danger of being…
Where to watch
Where to watch La La LandWhere to watch Trace of Stones
More like La La Land · More like Trace of Stones · Compare other titles