Land of Wolves vs Second in Command
Land of Wolves has the higher audience score (9.8/10 against 5.5/10 for Second in Command). Second in Command is the shorter watch at 1h 31m compared with 1h 40m. Second in Command is the older of the two (2006 against 2026). Both are action movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Land of Wolves | Second in Command | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 9.8/10 | ★ 5.5/10 |
| Year | 2026 | 2006 |
| Length | 1h 40m | 1h 31m |
| Genres | Action, War | Action |
| Country | US | – |
| Director | Tommy Jackson | Simon Fellows |
| Main cast | Joe Edward Metcalfe, James William Clark, Matthew Gray, Justin Mobley | Velibor Topic, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Raffaello Degruttola, Julie Cox, Elizabeth Barondes |
Synopsis
Land of Wolves
When a covert rescue mission goes wrong, four former Navy SEALs are captured and thrown into an underground death match. Watched by depraved billionaires, they are forced to fight in a brutal tournament. With no weapons and no way out, the team must rely on their training and unbreakable bond to survive the bloody arena, dismantle the entire operation and reclaim their freedom.
Second in Command
Armed insurgents attempt a coup d'etat in a troubled Eastern European country, and the president flees to the U.S. embassy for protection. When the U.S. ambassador is murdered by the ruthless and gun-happy rebels, it comes down to the second-in-command of the embassy, Sam Keenan, played by Belgian kickboxer Jean-Claude Van Damme, to use his amazing martial arts technique to defend the besieged.
Where to watch
Where to watch Land of WolvesWhere to watch Second in Command
More like Land of Wolves · More like Second in Command · Compare other titles
Land of Wolves
Second in Command