Let Me In vs Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 6.8/10 for Let Me In). Let Me In is the shorter watch at 1h 56m compared with 2h 15m. Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me is the older of the two (1992 against 2010). Both are drama, horror, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Let Me In
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me| Let Me In | Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.8/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 2010 | 1992 |
| Length | 1h 56m | 2h 15m |
| Genres | Drama, Horror, Mystery | Drama, Horror, Mystery |
| Country | Sweden | – |
| Director | Matt Reeves | David Lynch |
| Main cast | Dylan Minnette, Richard Jenkins, Kodi Smit-McPhee, Sasha Barrese, Cara Buono | Pamela Gidley, Mädchen Amick, Miguel Ferrer, Heather Graham, Ray Wise |
Synopsis
Let Me In
A bullied young boy befriends a young female vampire who lives in secrecy with her guardian. A remake of the movie “Let The Right One In” which was an adaptation of a book.
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
In the questionable town of Deer Meadow, Washington, FBI Agent Desmond inexplicably disappears while hunting for the man who murdered a teen girl. The killer is never apprehended, and, after experiencing dark visions and supernatural encounters, Agent Dale Cooper chillingly predicts that the culprit will claim another life. Meanwhile, in the more cozy town of Twin Peaks, hedonistic beauty Laura Palmer hangs with lowlifes and seems destined for…
Where to watch
Where to watch Let Me InWhere to watch Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
More like Let Me In · More like Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me · Compare other titles