Lions for Lambs vs Red Cliff
Red Cliff has the higher audience score (7.1/10 against 6/10 for Lions for Lambs). Lions for Lambs is the shorter watch at 1h 32m compared with 2h 25m. Lions for Lambs is the older of the two (2007 against 2008). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Lions for Lambs
Red Cliff| Lions for Lambs | Red Cliff | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.0/10 | ★ 7.1/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2008 |
| Length | 1h 32m | 2h 25m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Robert Redford | John Woo |
| Main cast | Kevin Dunn, Tom Cruise, Derek Luke, Michael Peña, Andrew Garfield | Chang Chen, Tony Leung Chiu-wai, Shido Nakamura, Takeshi Kaneshiro, Zhao Wei |
Synopsis
Lions for Lambs
Three stories told simultaneously in ninety minutes of real time: a Republican Senator who's a presidential hopeful gives an hour-long interview to a skeptical television reporter, detailing a strategy for victory in Afghanistan; two special forces ambushed on an Afghani ridge await rescue as Taliban forces close in; a poli-sci professor at a California college invites a student to re-engage.
Red Cliff
In 208 A.D., in the final days of the Han Dynasty, shrewd Prime Minster Cao convinced the fickle Emperor Han the only way to unite all of China was to declare war on the kingdoms of Xu in the west and East Wu in the south. Thus began a military campaign of unprecedented scale. Left with no other hope for survival, the kingdoms of Xu and East Wu formed an unlikely alliance.
Where to watch
Where to watch Lions for LambsWhere to watch Red Cliff
More like Lions for Lambs · More like Red Cliff · Compare other titles