Lions for Lambs vs Red Cliff II
Red Cliff II has the higher audience score (7.3/10 against 6/10 for Lions for Lambs). Lions for Lambs is the shorter watch at 1h 32m compared with 2h 21m. Lions for Lambs is the older of the two (2007 against 2009). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Lions for Lambs
Red Cliff II| Lions for Lambs | Red Cliff II | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.0/10 | ★ 7.3/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2009 |
| Length | 1h 32m | 2h 21m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | – | China |
| Director | Robert Redford | John Woo |
| Main cast | Kevin Dunn, Tom Cruise, Derek Luke, Michael Peña, Andrew Garfield | Chang Chen, Tony Leung Chiu-wai, Shido Nakamura, Takeshi Kaneshiro, Zhao Wei |
Synopsis
Lions for Lambs
Three stories told simultaneously in ninety minutes of real time: a Republican Senator who's a presidential hopeful gives an hour-long interview to a skeptical television reporter, detailing a strategy for victory in Afghanistan; two special forces ambushed on an Afghani ridge await rescue as Taliban forces close in; a poli-sci professor at a California college invites a student to re-engage.
Red Cliff II
The battle of Red Cliff continues and the alliance between Xu and East Wu is fracturing. With Cao Cao's massive forces on their doorstep, will the kingdoms of Xu and East Wu survive?
Where to watch
Where to watch Lions for LambsWhere to watch Red Cliff II
More like Lions for Lambs · More like Red Cliff II · Compare other titles