Lions for Lambs vs Red Tails
Red Tails has the higher audience score (6.6/10 against 6/10 for Lions for Lambs). Lions for Lambs is the shorter watch at 1h 32m compared with 2h 5m. Lions for Lambs is the older of the two (2007 against 2012). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Lions for Lambs
Red Tails| Lions for Lambs | Red Tails | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.0/10 | ★ 6.6/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2012 |
| Length | 1h 32m | 2h 5m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Robert Redford | Anthony Hemingway |
| Main cast | Kevin Dunn, Tom Cruise, Derek Luke, Michael Peña, Andrew Garfield | Bryan Cranston, Daniela Ruah, Gerald McRaney, Method Man, Terrence Howard |
Synopsis
Lions for Lambs
Three stories told simultaneously in ninety minutes of real time: a Republican Senator who's a presidential hopeful gives an hour-long interview to a skeptical television reporter, detailing a strategy for victory in Afghanistan; two special forces ambushed on an Afghani ridge await rescue as Taliban forces close in; a poli-sci professor at a California college invites a student to re-engage.
Red Tails
The story of the Tuskegee Airmen, the first African-American pilots to fly in a combat squadron during World War II.
Where to watch
Where to watch Lions for LambsWhere to watch Red Tails
More like Lions for Lambs · More like Red Tails · Compare other titles