Lions for Lambs vs Rob Roy
Rob Roy has the higher audience score (6.7/10 against 6/10 for Lions for Lambs). Lions for Lambs is the shorter watch at 1h 32m compared with 2h 19m. Rob Roy is the older of the two (1995 against 2007). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Lions for Lambs
Rob Roy| Lions for Lambs | Rob Roy | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.0/10 | ★ 6.7/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 1995 |
| Length | 1h 32m | 2h 19m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Robert Redford | Michael Caton-Jones |
| Main cast | Kevin Dunn, Tom Cruise, Derek Luke, Michael Peña, Andrew Garfield | David Hayman, John Hurt, Brian Cox, Jason Flemyng, Ewan Stewart |
Synopsis
Lions for Lambs
Three stories told simultaneously in ninety minutes of real time: a Republican Senator who's a presidential hopeful gives an hour-long interview to a skeptical television reporter, detailing a strategy for victory in Afghanistan; two special forces ambushed on an Afghani ridge await rescue as Taliban forces close in; a poli-sci professor at a California college invites a student to re-engage.
Rob Roy
In the highlands of Scotland in the 1700s, Rob Roy tries to lead his small town to a better future, by borrowing money from the local nobility to buy cattle to herd to market. When the money is stolen, Rob is forced into a Robin Hood lifestyle to defend his family and honour.
Where to watch
Where to watch Lions for LambsWhere to watch Rob Roy
More like Lions for Lambs · More like Rob Roy · Compare other titles