Lions for Lambs vs Saints and Soldiers
Saints and Soldiers has the higher audience score (6.3/10 against 6/10 for Lions for Lambs). Saints and Soldiers is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 1h 32m. Saints and Soldiers is the older of the two (2003 against 2007). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Lions for Lambs
Saints and Soldiers| Lions for Lambs | Saints and Soldiers | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.0/10 | ★ 6.3/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2003 |
| Length | 1h 32m | 1h 30m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Robert Redford | Ryan Little |
| Main cast | Kevin Dunn, Tom Cruise, Derek Luke, Michael Peña, Andrew Garfield | Melinda Renee, Larry Bagby, Kirby Heyborne, Peter Holden, Alexander Polinsky |
Synopsis
Lions for Lambs
Three stories told simultaneously in ninety minutes of real time: a Republican Senator who's a presidential hopeful gives an hour-long interview to a skeptical television reporter, detailing a strategy for victory in Afghanistan; two special forces ambushed on an Afghani ridge await rescue as Taliban forces close in; a poli-sci professor at a California college invites a student to re-engage.
Saints and Soldiers
Five American soldiers fighting in Europe during World War II struggle to return to Allied territory after being separated from U.S. forces during the historic Malmedy Massacre.
Where to watch
Where to watch Lions for LambsWhere to watch Saints and Soldiers
More like Lions for Lambs · More like Saints and Soldiers · Compare other titles