Lions for Lambs vs The Forgotten Battle
The Forgotten Battle has the higher audience score (7.1/10 against 6/10 for Lions for Lambs). Lions for Lambs is the shorter watch at 1h 32m compared with 2h 6m. Lions for Lambs is the older of the two (2007 against 2020). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Lions for Lambs
The Forgotten Battle| Lions for Lambs | The Forgotten Battle | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.0/10 | ★ 7.1/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2020 |
| Length | 1h 32m | 2h 6m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Robert Redford | Matthijs van Heijningen Jr. |
| Main cast | Kevin Dunn, Tom Cruise, Derek Luke, Michael Peña, Andrew Garfield | Theo Barklem-Biggs, Gijs Blom, Tom Felton, Jamie Flatters, Justus von Dohnányi |
Synopsis
Lions for Lambs
Three stories told simultaneously in ninety minutes of real time: a Republican Senator who's a presidential hopeful gives an hour-long interview to a skeptical television reporter, detailing a strategy for victory in Afghanistan; two special forces ambushed on an Afghani ridge await rescue as Taliban forces close in; a poli-sci professor at a California college invites a student to re-engage.
The Forgotten Battle
In WWII's final years, a soldier in the German army, a British glider pilot, and a Dutch resistance fighter's paths intertwine. Their choices shape destinies, impacting not only their freedom but also that of others.
Where to watch
Where to watch Lions for LambsWhere to watch The Forgotten Battle
More like Lions for Lambs · More like The Forgotten Battle · Compare other titles