Lions for Lambs vs The Red Baron
The Red Baron has the higher audience score (6.6/10 against 6/10 for Lions for Lambs). Lions for Lambs is the shorter watch at 1h 32m compared with 1h 46m. Lions for Lambs is the older of the two (2007 against 2008). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Lions for Lambs
The Red Baron| Lions for Lambs | The Red Baron | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.0/10 | ★ 6.6/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2008 |
| Length | 1h 32m | 1h 46m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Robert Redford | Nikolai Müllerschön |
| Main cast | Kevin Dunn, Tom Cruise, Derek Luke, Michael Peña, Andrew Garfield | Lena Headey, Til Schweiger, Julie Engelbrecht, Joseph Fiennes, Matthias Schweighöfer |
Synopsis
Lions for Lambs
Three stories told simultaneously in ninety minutes of real time: a Republican Senator who's a presidential hopeful gives an hour-long interview to a skeptical television reporter, detailing a strategy for victory in Afghanistan; two special forces ambushed on an Afghani ridge await rescue as Taliban forces close in; a poli-sci professor at a California college invites a student to re-engage.
The Red Baron
Richthofen goes off to war like thousands of other men. As fighter pilots, they become cult heroes for the soldiers on the battlefields. Marked by sportsmanlike conduct, technical exactitude and knightly propriety, they have their own code of honour. Before long he begins to understand that his hero status is deceptive. His love for Kate, a nurse, opens his eyes to the brutality of war.
Where to watch
Where to watch Lions for LambsWhere to watch The Red Baron
More like Lions for Lambs · More like The Red Baron · Compare other titles