Lions for Lambs vs The Tiger
The Tiger has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 6/10 for Lions for Lambs). Lions for Lambs is the shorter watch at 1h 32m compared with 2h 19m. Lions for Lambs is the older of the two (2007 against 2015). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Lions for Lambs
The Tiger| Lions for Lambs | The Tiger | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.0/10 | ★ 7.7/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2015 |
| Length | 1h 32m | 2h 19m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History | Action, Adventure, Drama, History |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Robert Redford | Park Hoon-jung |
| Main cast | Kevin Dunn, Tom Cruise, Derek Luke, Michael Peña, Andrew Garfield | Jeong Man-sik, Sung Yu-been, Choi Min-sik, Lee Na-ra, Jung Ji-so |
Synopsis
Lions for Lambs
Three stories told simultaneously in ninety minutes of real time: a Republican Senator who's a presidential hopeful gives an hour-long interview to a skeptical television reporter, detailing a strategy for victory in Afghanistan; two special forces ambushed on an Afghani ridge await rescue as Taliban forces close in; a poli-sci professor at a California college invites a student to re-engage.
The Tiger
In 1925 Korea, Japanese rulers demand the last remaining tiger be killed. The tiger easily defeats his pursuers until a legendary hunter takes him on.
Where to watch
Where to watch Lions for LambsWhere to watch The Tiger
More like Lions for Lambs · More like The Tiger · Compare other titles