Live Flesh vs Submergence
Live Flesh has the higher audience score (7.1/10 against 5.5/10 for Submergence). Live Flesh is the shorter watch at 1h 43m compared with 1h 52m. Live Flesh is the older of the two (1997 against 2017). Both are drama, romance, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Live Flesh | Submergence | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.1/10 | ★ 5.5/10 |
| Year | 1997 | 2017 |
| Length | 1h 43m | 1h 52m |
| Genres | Drama, Romance, Thriller | Drama, Romance, Thriller |
| Country | Spain | – |
| Director | Pedro Almodóvar | Wim Wenders |
| Main cast | Penélope Cruz, Javier Bardem, Francesca Neri, Liberto Rabal, Ángela Molina | Alexander Siddig, Alex Hafner, Jean-Pierre Lorit, Thibaut Évrard, James McAvoy |
Synopsis
Live Flesh
When Victor attempts to seduce Elena, all he gets for his trouble is a one-way, six-year ticket to prison, where he concentrates on strengthening his mind, his body... and his desire for vengeance on the man who put him there. After his release and still madly in love with her, Victor will stop at nothing to win her over even if means revenge, for Elena has married David, the cop who sent him to prison!
Submergence
While James More is held captive by terrorists in Somalia, thousands of miles away on the Greenland Sea, his lover Danny Flinders prepares to dive herself in a submersible into the deep bottom of the ocean, tormented by the memories of their brief encounter in France and her inability to know his whereabouts.
Where to watch
Where to watch Live FleshWhere to watch Submergence
More like Live Flesh · More like Submergence · Compare other titles
Live Flesh
Submergence