Lost in Translation vs Millennium Actress
Millennium Actress has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 7.4/10 for Lost in Translation). Millennium Actress is the shorter watch at 1h 27m compared with 1h 42m. Millennium Actress is the older of the two (2002 against 2003). Both are comedy, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Lost in Translation
Millennium Actress| Lost in Translation | Millennium Actress | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.4/10 | ★ 7.8/10 |
| Year | 2003 | 2002 |
| Length | 1h 42m | 1h 27m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Romance | Animation, Comedy, Drama, Fantasy, Romance |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Sofia Coppola | Satoshi Kon |
| Main cast | Bill Murray, Giovanni Ribisi, Anna Faris, Scarlett Johansson, Akiko Takeshita | Fumiko Orikasa, Koichi Yamadera, Shozo Iizuka, Masaya Onosaka, Masane Tsukayama |
Synopsis
Lost in Translation
Two lost souls visiting Tokyo -- the young, neglected wife of a photographer and a washed-up movie star shooting a TV commercial -- find an odd solace and pensive freedom to be real in each other's company, away from their lives in America.
Millennium Actress
Documentary filmmaker Genya Tachibana has tracked down the legendary actress Chiyoko Fujiwara, who mysteriously vanished at the height of her career. When he presents her with a key she had lost and thought was gone forever, the filmmaker could not have imagined that it would not only unlock the long-held secrets of Chiyoko’s life... but also his own.
Where to watch
Where to watch Lost in TranslationWhere to watch Millennium Actress
More like Lost in Translation · More like Millennium Actress · Compare other titles