Lost in Translation vs Princes and Princesses
Princes and Princesses has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 7.4/10 for Lost in Translation). Princes and Princesses is the shorter watch at 1h 10m compared with 1h 42m. Princes and Princesses is the older of the two (2000 against 2003). Both are comedy, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Lost in Translation
Princes and Princesses| Lost in Translation | Princes and Princesses | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.4/10 | ★ 7.7/10 |
| Year | 2003 | 2000 |
| Length | 1h 42m | 1h 10m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Romance | Adventure, Animation, Comedy, Drama, Family, Fantasy, Mystery, Romance |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Sofia Coppola | Michel Ocelot |
| Main cast | Bill Murray, Giovanni Ribisi, Anna Faris, Scarlett Johansson, Akiko Takeshita | Yves Barsacq, Philippe Cheytion, Arlette Mirapeu, François Voisin |
Synopsis
Lost in Translation
Two lost souls visiting Tokyo -- the young, neglected wife of a photographer and a washed-up movie star shooting a TV commercial -- find an odd solace and pensive freedom to be real in each other's company, away from their lives in America.
Princes and Princesses
In this episodic animated fantasy from France, an art teacher interprets a series of six fairy tales (each involving a prince or princess) with the help of two precocious students. Princes and Princesses was created using a special style of cutout animation, with black silhouetted characters performing the action against backlit backdrops in striking colors.
Where to watch
Where to watch Lost in TranslationWhere to watch Princes and Princesses
More like Lost in Translation · More like Princes and Princesses · Compare other titles