Man on Fire vs No Tears for the Dead
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 7.3/10 for No Tears for the Dead). No Tears for the Dead is the shorter watch at 1h 57m compared with 2h 26m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2014). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Man on Fire
No Tears for the Dead| Man on Fire | No Tears for the Dead | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.5/10 | ★ 7.3/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2014 |
| Length | 2h 26m | 1h 57m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Tony Scott | Lee Jeong-beom |
| Main cast | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke | Jang Dong-gun, Brian Tee, Dana Lee, Jeon Bae-soo, Rich Ting |
Synopsis
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
No Tears for the Dead
A hitman accidentally kills a little girl. Filled with regret, he wants to quit. But then to tie up loose ends, he is forced to go on another job, to kill the girl's mother.
Where to watch
Where to watch Man on FireWhere to watch No Tears for the Dead
More like Man on Fire · More like No Tears for the Dead · Compare other titles