Man on Fire vs Pandora
Man on Fire and Pandora are tied on audience score (7.5/10). Pandora is the shorter watch at 2h 16m compared with 2h 26m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2016). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Man on Fire | Pandora | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.5/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2016 |
| Length | 2h 26m | 2h 16m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Tony Scott | Park Jung-woo |
| Main cast | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke | Kim Dae-myung, Jung Jin-young, Moon Jeong-hee, Lee Kyung-young, Kang Shin-il |
Synopsis
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Pandora
When an earthquake hits a Korean village housing a run-down nuclear power plant, a man risks his life to save the country from imminent disaster.
Where to watch
Where to watch Man on FireWhere to watch Pandora
More like Man on Fire · More like Pandora · Compare other titles
Man on Fire
Pandora