Man on Fire vs Proof of Life
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.1/10 for Proof of Life). Proof of Life is the shorter watch at 2h 15m compared with 2h 26m. Proof of Life is the older of the two (2000 against 2004). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Man on Fire
Proof of Life| Man on Fire | Proof of Life | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.5/10 | ★ 6.1/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2000 |
| Length | 2h 26m | 2h 15m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Tony Scott | Taylor Hackford |
| Main cast | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke | Margo Martindale, Michael Kitchen, David Morse, Russell Crowe, Meg Ryan |
Synopsis
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Proof of Life
When American engineer Peter Bowman is kidnapped while working in South America, his wife Alice enlists special agent Terry Thorne to help free him. However, complications arise when Thorne falls in love with her. Their lives are on the line, their hearts out on a limb.
Where to watch
Where to watch Man on FireWhere to watch Proof of Life
More like Man on Fire · More like Proof of Life · Compare other titles