Man on Fire vs Rising Sun
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.1/10 for Rising Sun). Rising Sun is the shorter watch at 2h 5m compared with 2h 26m. Rising Sun is the older of the two (1993 against 2004). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Man on Fire | Rising Sun | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.5/10 | ★ 6.1/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 1993 |
| Length | 2h 26m | 2h 5m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Tony Scott | Philip Kaufman |
| Main cast | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke | Steve Buscemi, Daniel von Bargen, Mako, Harvey Keitel, Wesley Snipes |
Synopsis
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Rising Sun
When a prostitute is found dead in a Los Angeles skyscraper occupied by a large Japanese corporation, detectives John Connor and Web Smith are called in to investigate. Although Connor has previous experience working in Japan, cultural differences make their progress difficult until a security disc showing the murder turns up. Close scrutiny proves the disc has been doctored, and the detectives realize they're dealing with a cover-up as well.
Where to watch
Where to watch Man on FireWhere to watch Rising Sun
More like Man on Fire · More like Rising Sun · Compare other titles
Man on Fire
Rising Sun