Man on Fire vs The Dark Knight
The Dark Knight has the higher audience score (8.5/10 against 7.5/10 for Man on Fire). Man on Fire is the shorter watch at 2h 26m compared with 2h 32m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2008). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Man on Fire
The Dark Knight| Man on Fire | The Dark Knight | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.5/10 | ★ 8.5/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2008 |
| Length | 2h 26m | 2h 32m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Tony Scott | Christopher Nolan |
| Main cast | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke | Nestor Carbonell, Aaron Eckhart, Monique Gabriela Curnen, Cillian Murphy, Anthony Michael Hall |
Synopsis
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
The Dark Knight
Batman raises the stakes in his war on crime. With the help of Lt. Jim Gordon and District Attorney Harvey Dent, Batman sets out to dismantle the remaining criminal organizations that plague the streets. The partnership proves to be effective, but they soon find themselves prey to a reign of chaos unleashed by a rising criminal mastermind known to the terrified citizens of Gotham as the Joker.
Where to watch
Where to watch Man on FireWhere to watch The Dark Knight
More like Man on Fire · More like The Dark Knight · Compare other titles