Man on Fire vs The Sum of All Fears
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.4/10 for The Sum of All Fears). The Sum of All Fears is the shorter watch at 2h 4m compared with 2h 26m. The Sum of All Fears is the older of the two (2002 against 2004). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Man on Fire
The Sum of All Fears| Man on Fire | The Sum of All Fears | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.5/10 | ★ 6.4/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2002 |
| Length | 2h 26m | 2h 4m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Tony Scott | Phil Alden Robinson |
| Main cast | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke | Ron Rifkin, Bridget Moynahan, Liev Schreiber, Colm Feore, Ben Affleck |
Synopsis
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
The Sum of All Fears
When the president of Russia suddenly dies, a man whose politics are virtually unknown succeeds him. The change in political leaders sparks paranoia among American CIA officials, so CIA director Bill Cabot recruits a young analyst to supply insight and advice on the situation. Then the unthinkable happens: a nuclear bomb explodes in a U.S. city, and America is quick to blame the Russians.
Where to watch
Where to watch Man on FireWhere to watch The Sum of All Fears
More like Man on Fire · More like The Sum of All Fears · Compare other titles