Man on Fire vs Time to Hunt
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 7.2/10 for Time to Hunt). Time to Hunt is the shorter watch at 2h 15m compared with 2h 26m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2020). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Man on Fire
Time to Hunt| Man on Fire | Time to Hunt | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.5/10 | ★ 7.2/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2020 |
| Length | 2h 26m | 2h 15m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Tony Scott | Yoon Sung-hyun |
| Main cast | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke | Park Hae-soo, Park Jeong-min, Cho Seong-ha, Kim Won-hae, Ahn Jae-hong |
Synopsis
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Time to Hunt
Four young men want to leave their dystopian world behind and go to a distant paradise to execute a money robbery, a daring act that will have unexpected consequences.
Where to watch
Where to watch Man on FireWhere to watch Time to Hunt
More like Man on Fire · More like Time to Hunt · Compare other titles