Man on Fire vs Undisputed III: Redemption
Man on Fire and Undisputed III: Redemption are tied on audience score (7.5/10). Undisputed III: Redemption is the shorter watch at 1h 36m compared with 2h 26m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2010). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Man on Fire
Undisputed III: Redemption| Man on Fire | Undisputed III: Redemption | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.5/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2004 | 2010 |
| Length | 2h 26m | 1h 36m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Tony Scott | Isaac Florentine |
| Main cast | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke | Mark Ivanir, Robert Costanzo, Hristo Shopov, Scott Adkins, Marko Zaror |
Synopsis
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Undisputed III: Redemption
Russian inmate Boyka, now severely hobbled by the knee injury suffered at the end of Undisputed 2. No longer the feared prison fighter he was, he has declined so far that he is now good only for cleaning toilets. But when a new prison fight tournament begins - an international affair, matching the best fighters from prisons around the globe, enticing them with the promise of freedom for the winner - Boyka must reclaim his dignity and fight for…
Where to watch
Where to watch Man on FireWhere to watch Undisputed III: Redemption
More like Man on Fire · More like Undisputed III: Redemption · Compare other titles