Maverick vs Why Don't You Play in Hell?
Why Don't You Play in Hell? has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 6.9/10 for Maverick). Maverick is the shorter watch at 2h 7m compared with 2h 10m. Maverick is the older of the two (1994 against 2013). Both are action, comedy, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Maverick | Why Don't You Play in Hell? | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.9/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 1994 | 2013 |
| Length | 2h 7m | 2h 10m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Comedy, Drama, Western | Action, Comedy, Drama |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Richard Donner | Sion Sono |
| Main cast | Mel Gibson, Jodie Foster, Alfred Molina, James Garner, Dan Hedaya | Fumi Nikaido, Jun Kunimura, Tak Sakaguchi, Hiroki Hasegawa, Shinichi Tsutsumi |
Synopsis
Maverick
Bret Maverick is a gambler who would rather con someone than fight them, and needs an additional $3k in order to enter a winner-takes-all poker game beginning in a few days. He joins forces with a woman with a marvelous Southern accent, and the two try and enter the game.
Why Don't You Play in Hell?
In Japan, gonzo filmmakers hatch a three-pronged plan to save an actress's career, end a yakuza war and make a hit movie.
Where to watch
Where to watch MaverickWhere to watch Why Don't You Play in Hell?
More like Maverick · More like Why Don't You Play in Hell? · Compare other titles
Maverick
Why Don't You Play in Hell?