Maximum Risk vs Undisputed III: Redemption
Undisputed III: Redemption has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 5.8/10 for Maximum Risk). Undisputed III: Redemption is the shorter watch at 1h 36m compared with 1h 40m. Maximum Risk is the older of the two (1996 against 2010). Both are action, crime, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Maximum Risk
Undisputed III: Redemption| Maximum Risk | Undisputed III: Redemption | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.8/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 1996 | 2010 |
| Length | 1h 40m | 1h 36m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Ringo Lam Ling-Tung | Isaac Florentine |
| Main cast | Paul Ben-Victor, Natasha Henstridge, Gloria Slade, Joe Pingue, Jean-Claude Van Damme | Mark Ivanir, Robert Costanzo, Hristo Shopov, Scott Adkins, Marko Zaror |
Synopsis
Maximum Risk
Alain Moreau's investigation into the death of his identical twin brother leads him from the beauty of the south of France to the mean streets of New York City and into the arms of his brother's beautiful girlfriend. Pursued by ruthless Russian mobsters and renegade FBI agents, the duo race against time to solve his brother's murder and expose an international conspiracy.
Undisputed III: Redemption
Russian inmate Boyka, now severely hobbled by the knee injury suffered at the end of Undisputed 2. No longer the feared prison fighter he was, he has declined so far that he is now good only for cleaning toilets. But when a new prison fight tournament begins - an international affair, matching the best fighters from prisons around the globe, enticing them with the promise of freedom for the winner - Boyka must reclaim his dignity and fight for…
Where to watch
Where to watch Maximum RiskWhere to watch Undisputed III: Redemption
More like Maximum Risk · More like Undisputed III: Redemption · Compare other titles