Millennium Actress vs Trace of Stones

Millennium Actress has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 6.1/10 for Trace of Stones). Millennium Actress is the shorter watch at 1h 27m compared with 2h 19m. Trace of Stones is the older of the two (1966 against 2002). Both are comedy, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Millennium Actress posterMillennium Actress2002 VS Trace of Stones posterTrace of Stones1966
Millennium ActressTrace of Stones
Audience score★ 7.8/10★ 6.1/10
Year20021966
Length1h 27m2h 19m
GenresAnimation, Comedy, Drama, Fantasy, RomanceComedy, Drama, Romance
Country––
DirectorSatoshi KonFrank Beyer
Main castFumiko Orikasa, Koichi Yamadera, Shozo Iizuka, Masaya Onosaka, Masane TsukayamaHans-Peter Reinecke, Manfred Krug, Krystyna Stypułkowska, Eberhard Esche, Johannes Wieke

Synopsis

Millennium Actress

Documentary filmmaker Genya Tachibana has tracked down the legendary actress Chiyoko Fujiwara, who mysteriously vanished at the height of her career. When he presents her with a key she had lost and thought was gone forever, the filmmaker could not have imagined that it would not only unlock the long-held secrets of Chiyoko’s life... but also his own.

Trace of Stones

Bad planning and shortages prevail on an East German construction site. Foreman Hannes Balla uses unconventional methods to overcome the problems. New Socialist Unity Party secretary Werner Horrath is charged with bringing the rough-and-ready builder crew into line. The task seems doomed to fail as the two men compete for the affections of young engineer Kati Klee. But when she gets pregnant by married man Horrath, he is in danger of being…

Where to watch

Where to watch Millennium ActressWhere to watch Trace of Stones

More like Millennium Actress · More like Trace of Stones · Compare other titles