Mississippi Burning vs Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
Mississippi Burning has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 4.9/10 for Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough). Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough is the shorter watch at 1h 27m compared with 2h 8m. Mississippi Burning is the older of the two (1988 against 2005). Both are crime, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Mississippi Burning
Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough| Mississippi Burning | Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.7/10 | ★ 4.9/10 |
| Year | 1988 | 2005 |
| Length | 2h 8m | 1h 27m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Crime, Drama, Mystery |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Alan Parker | Jay Lowi |
| Main cast | Brad Dourif, Kevin Dunn, Pruitt Taylor Vince, Willem Dafoe, Stephen Tobolowsky | Linden Ashby, Claire Coffee, Brad Johnson, Eric Fleeks, Dina Meyer |
Synopsis
Mississippi Burning
Two FBI agents investigating the murder of civil rights workers during the 60s seek to breach the conspiracy of silence in a small Southern town where segregation divides black and white. The younger agent trained in FBI school runs up against the small town ways of his partner, a former sheriff.
Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
Two young women will stop at nothing for one to gain a $4 million inheritance of two priceless diamonds, while two detectives try to thwart their plans, but find complications abound.
Where to watch
Where to watch Mississippi BurningWhere to watch Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
More like Mississippi Burning · More like Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough · Compare other titles