Mudbound vs Once Upon a Time in a Cinema
Once Upon a Time in a Cinema has the higher audience score (10/10 against 7.4/10 for Mudbound). Once Upon a Time in a Cinema is the shorter watch at 1h 32m compared with 2h 15m. Mudbound is the older of the two (2017 against 2026). Both are drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Mudbound
Once Upon a Time in a Cinema| Mudbound | Once Upon a Time in a Cinema | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.4/10 | ★ 10.0/10 |
| Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Length | 2h 15m | 1h 32m |
| Genres | Drama | Drama |
| Country | United States of America | Ireland |
| Director | Dee Rees | David Gleeson |
| Main cast | Jonathan Banks, Mary J. Blige, Garrett Hedlund, Jason Clarke, Carey Mulligan | Colin Morgan, Andrew Bennett, Niamh Cusack, Stanley Townsend, Liam O'Brien |
Synopsis
Mudbound
In the post–World War II South, two families are pitted against a barbaric social hierarchy and an unrelenting landscape as they simultaneously fight the battle at home and the battle abroad.
Once Upon a Time in a Cinema
Earl Clancy, a cinema owner on the edge, battles a series of disasters while juggling personal turmoil and the chaos of a packed Friday night crowd. Told in real time over the course of the movie playing in the cinema.
Where to watch
Where to watch MudboundWhere to watch Once Upon a Time in a Cinema
More like Mudbound · More like Once Upon a Time in a Cinema · Compare other titles