Naked Lies vs Nowhere to Run
Nowhere to Run has the higher audience score (6.4/10 against 5/10 for Naked Lies). Naked Lies is the shorter watch at 1h 33m compared with 1h 34m. Nowhere to Run is the older of the two (1993 against 1998). Both are action, romance, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Naked Lies | Nowhere to Run | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.0/10 | ★ 6.4/10 |
| Year | 1998 | 1993 |
| Length | 1h 33m | 1h 34m |
| Genres | Action, Romance, Thriller | Action, Drama, Romance, Thriller |
| Country | Mexico | – |
| Director | Ralph E. Portillo | Robert Harmon |
| Main cast | Steven Bauer, Michael Rose, Shannon Tweed, Hugo Stiglitz, Fernando Allende | Kieran Culkin, Rosanna Arquette, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Ted Levine, Tiffany Taubman |
Synopsis
Naked Lies
FBI agent Cara Landry is sent on an undercover assignment to gather evidence on Damian Medina, a Mexican casino owner running a counterfeiting operation for the Cali drug cartel...
Nowhere to Run
Escaped convict Sam Gillen single-handedly takes on ruthless developers who are determined to evict a widow with two young children.
Where to watch
Where to watch Naked LiesWhere to watch Nowhere to Run
More like Naked Lies · More like Nowhere to Run · Compare other titles
Naked Lies
Nowhere to Run