Never Met Picasso vs Princes and Princesses
Princes and Princesses has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 4.7/10 for Never Met Picasso). Princes and Princesses is the shorter watch at 1h 10m compared with 1h 41m. Never Met Picasso is the older of the two (1997 against 2000). Both are comedy, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Never Met Picasso
Princes and Princesses| Never Met Picasso | Princes and Princesses | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 4.7/10 | ★ 7.7/10 |
| Year | 1997 | 2000 |
| Length | 1h 41m | 1h 10m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Romance | Adventure, Animation, Comedy, Drama, Family, Fantasy, Mystery, Romance |
| Country | United States of America | France |
| Director | Stephen Kijak | Michel Ocelot |
| Main cast | Keith David, Margot Kidder, Alexis Arquette, Don McKellar, Richard Snee | Yves Barsacq, Philippe Cheytion, Arlette Mirapeu, François Voisin |
Synopsis
Never Met Picasso
Still living at home with his avant-garde actress mother, constantly rejected by art schools, and without a lover, aspiring painter Andrew decides to enter a contest in hopes of winning a six month stay in Kenya. Though things aren't great for Andrew, neither are they wonderful for his lesbian friend Lucy who constantly bickers with her lover Ingrid. Lucy complicates Andrew's life when she introduces him to the suspicious-looking, enigmatic…
Princes and Princesses
In this episodic animated fantasy from France, an art teacher interprets a series of six fairy tales (each involving a prince or princess) with the help of two precocious students. Princes and Princesses was created using a special style of cutout animation, with black silhouetted characters performing the action against backlit backdrops in striking colors.
Where to watch
Where to watch Never Met PicassoWhere to watch Princes and Princesses
More like Never Met Picasso · More like Princes and Princesses · Compare other titles