No Country for Old Men vs Rust
No Country for Old Men has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 6.7/10 for Rust). No Country for Old Men is the shorter watch at 2h 2m compared with 2h 19m. No Country for Old Men is the older of the two (2007 against 2025). Both are western movies, so they suit a similar mood.
No Country for Old Men
Rust| No Country for Old Men | Rust | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.9/10 | ★ 6.7/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2025 |
| Length | 2h 2m | 2h 19m |
| Genres | Crime, Thriller, Western | Western |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Ethan Coen, Joel Coen | Joel Souza |
| Main cast | Kelly Macdonald, Josh Brolin, Stephen Root, Tommy Lee Jones, Javier Bardem | Frances Fisher, Travis Fimmel, Alec Baldwin, Xander Berkeley, Josh Hopkins |
Synopsis
No Country for Old Men
Llewelyn Moss stumbles upon dead bodies, $2 million and a hoard of heroin in a Texas desert, but methodical killer Anton Chigurh comes looking for it, with local sheriff Ed Tom Bell hot on his trail. The roles of prey and predator blur as the violent pursuit of money and justice collide.
Rust
Infamous outlaw Harland Rust breaks his estranged grandson Lucas out of prison, after Lucas is convicted to hang for an accidental murder. The two must outrun legendary U.S Marshal Wood Helm and bounty hunter Fenton "Preacher" Lang who are hot on their tails. Deeply buried secrets rise from the ashes and an unexpected familial bond begins to form as the mismatched duo tries to survive the merciless American Frontier.
Where to watch
Where to watch No Country for Old MenWhere to watch Rust
More like No Country for Old Men · More like Rust · Compare other titles