No Game, No Life: Zero vs Only Lovers Left Alive
No Game, No Life: Zero has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 7.2/10 for Only Lovers Left Alive). No Game, No Life: Zero is the shorter watch at 1h 46m compared with 2h 3m. Only Lovers Left Alive is the older of the two (2013 against 2017). Both are drama, fantasy, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
No Game, No Life: Zero
Only Lovers Left Alive| No Game, No Life: Zero | Only Lovers Left Alive | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.8/10 | ★ 7.2/10 |
| Year | 2017 | 2013 |
| Length | 1h 46m | 2h 3m |
| Genres | Adventure, Animation, Drama, Fantasy, Romance | Drama, Fantasy, Romance |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Atsuko Ishizuka | Jim Jarmusch |
| Main cast | Yuka Iguchi, Nanako Mori, Yoko Hikasa, Yoshitsugu Matsuoka, Rie Kugimiya | John Hurt, Jeffrey Wright, Tom Hiddleston, Tilda Swinton, Anton Yelchin |
Synopsis
No Game, No Life: Zero
Six thousand years before Sora and Shiro were even a blink in the history of Disboard, war consumed the land, tearing apart the heavens, destroying stars, and even threatening to wipe out the human race. Amid the chaos and destruction, a young man named Riku leads humanity toward the tomorrow his heart believes in. One day, in the ruins of an Elf city, he meets Schwi, a female exiled "Ex Machina" android who asks him to teach her what it means…
Only Lovers Left Alive
A depressed musician reunites with his lover. However, their romance, already played over several centuries, is disrupted by the arrival of her uncontrollable younger sister.
Where to watch
Where to watch No Game, No Life: ZeroWhere to watch Only Lovers Left Alive
More like No Game, No Life: Zero · More like Only Lovers Left Alive · Compare other titles