No Game, No Life: Zero vs Quest for Camelot

No Game, No Life: Zero has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 6.8/10 for Quest for Camelot). Quest for Camelot is the shorter watch at 1h 26m compared with 1h 46m. Quest for Camelot is the older of the two (1998 against 2017). Both are animation, drama, fantasy movies, so they suit a similar mood.

No Game, No Life: Zero posterNo Game, No Life: Zero2017 VS Quest for Camelot posterQuest for Camelot1998
No Game, No Life: ZeroQuest for Camelot
Audience score★ 7.8/10★ 6.8/10
Year20171998
Length1h 46m1h 26m
GenresAdventure, Animation, Drama, Fantasy, RomanceAnimation, Drama, Family, Fantasy, Romance
Country––
DirectorAtsuko IshizukaFrederik Du Chau
Main castYuka Iguchi, Nanako Mori, Yoko Hikasa, Yoshitsugu Matsuoka, Rie KugimiyaPierce Brosnan, Gary Oldman, Cary Elwes, Eric Idle, Bronson Pinchot

Synopsis

No Game, No Life: Zero

Six thousand years before Sora and Shiro were even a blink in the history of Disboard, war consumed the land, tearing apart the heavens, destroying stars, and even threatening to wipe out the human race. Amid the chaos and destruction, a young man named Riku leads humanity toward the tomorrow his heart believes in. One day, in the ruins of an Elf city, he meets Schwi, a female exiled "Ex Machina" android who asks him to teach her what it means…

Quest for Camelot

During the times of King Arthur, Kayley is a brave girl who dreams of following her late father as a Knight of the Round Table. The evil Ruber wants to invade Camelot and take the throne of King Arthur, and Kayley has to stop him.

Where to watch

Where to watch No Game, No Life: ZeroWhere to watch Quest for Camelot

More like No Game, No Life: Zero · More like Quest for Camelot · Compare other titles