No Game, No Life: Zero vs The Legend of Bagger Vance

No Game, No Life: Zero has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 6.6/10 for The Legend of Bagger Vance). No Game, No Life: Zero is the shorter watch at 1h 46m compared with 2h 6m. The Legend of Bagger Vance is the older of the two (2000 against 2017). Both are drama, fantasy, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.

No Game, No Life: Zero posterNo Game, No Life: Zero2017 VS The Legend of Bagger Vance posterThe Legend of Bagger Vance2000
No Game, No Life: ZeroThe Legend of Bagger Vance
Audience score★ 7.8/10★ 6.6/10
Year20172000
Length1h 46m2h 6m
GenresAdventure, Animation, Drama, Fantasy, RomanceDrama, Fantasy, Romance
Country––
DirectorAtsuko IshizukaRobert Redford
Main castYuka Iguchi, Nanako Mori, Yoko Hikasa, Yoshitsugu Matsuoka, Rie KugimiyaCarrie Preston, Charlize Theron, Harve Presnell, Matt Damon, Will Smith

Synopsis

No Game, No Life: Zero

Six thousand years before Sora and Shiro were even a blink in the history of Disboard, war consumed the land, tearing apart the heavens, destroying stars, and even threatening to wipe out the human race. Amid the chaos and destruction, a young man named Riku leads humanity toward the tomorrow his heart believes in. One day, in the ruins of an Elf city, he meets Schwi, a female exiled "Ex Machina" android who asks him to teach her what it means…

The Legend of Bagger Vance

World War I has left golfer Rannulph Junuh a poker-playing alcoholic, his perfect swing gone. Now, however, he needs to get it back to play in a tournament to save the financially ravaged golf course of a long-ago sweetheart. Help arrives in the form of mysterious caddy Bagger Vance.

Where to watch

Where to watch No Game, No Life: ZeroWhere to watch The Legend of Bagger Vance

More like No Game, No Life: Zero · More like The Legend of Bagger Vance · Compare other titles