No Game, No Life: Zero vs Where the Wild Things Are
No Game, No Life: Zero has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 6.5/10 for Where the Wild Things Are). Where the Wild Things Are is the shorter watch at 1h 41m compared with 1h 46m. Where the Wild Things Are is the older of the two (2009 against 2017). Both are adventure, drama, fantasy movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| No Game, No Life: Zero | Where the Wild Things Are | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.8/10 | ★ 6.5/10 |
| Year | 2017 | 2009 |
| Length | 1h 46m | 1h 41m |
| Genres | Adventure, Animation, Drama, Fantasy, Romance | Adventure, Drama, Fantasy |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Atsuko Ishizuka | Spike Jonze |
| Main cast | Yuka Iguchi, Nanako Mori, Yoko Hikasa, Yoshitsugu Matsuoka, Rie Kugimiya | Paul Dano, Forest Whitaker, Chris Cooper, Mark Ruffalo, Catherine O'Hara |
Synopsis
No Game, No Life: Zero
Six thousand years before Sora and Shiro were even a blink in the history of Disboard, war consumed the land, tearing apart the heavens, destroying stars, and even threatening to wipe out the human race. Amid the chaos and destruction, a young man named Riku leads humanity toward the tomorrow his heart believes in. One day, in the ruins of an Elf city, he meets Schwi, a female exiled "Ex Machina" android who asks him to teach her what it means…
Where the Wild Things Are
Max imagines running away from his mom and sailing to a far-off land where large talking beasts—Ira, Carol, Douglas, the Bull, Judith and Alexander—crown him as their king, play rumpus, build forts and discover secret hideaways.
Where to watch
Where to watch No Game, No Life: ZeroWhere to watch Where the Wild Things Are
More like No Game, No Life: Zero · More like Where the Wild Things Are · Compare other titles
No Game, No Life: Zero
Where the Wild Things Are