No Game, No Life: Zero vs Where the Wild Things Are

No Game, No Life: Zero has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 6.5/10 for Where the Wild Things Are). Where the Wild Things Are is the shorter watch at 1h 41m compared with 1h 46m. Where the Wild Things Are is the older of the two (2009 against 2017). Both are adventure, drama, fantasy movies, so they suit a similar mood.

No Game, No Life: Zero posterNo Game, No Life: Zero2017 VS Where the Wild Things Are posterWhere the Wild Things Are2009
No Game, No Life: ZeroWhere the Wild Things Are
Audience score★ 7.8/10★ 6.5/10
Year20172009
Length1h 46m1h 41m
GenresAdventure, Animation, Drama, Fantasy, RomanceAdventure, Drama, Fantasy
Country–United States of America
DirectorAtsuko IshizukaSpike Jonze
Main castYuka Iguchi, Nanako Mori, Yoko Hikasa, Yoshitsugu Matsuoka, Rie KugimiyaPaul Dano, Forest Whitaker, Chris Cooper, Mark Ruffalo, Catherine O'Hara

Synopsis

No Game, No Life: Zero

Six thousand years before Sora and Shiro were even a blink in the history of Disboard, war consumed the land, tearing apart the heavens, destroying stars, and even threatening to wipe out the human race. Amid the chaos and destruction, a young man named Riku leads humanity toward the tomorrow his heart believes in. One day, in the ruins of an Elf city, he meets Schwi, a female exiled "Ex Machina" android who asks him to teach her what it means…

Where the Wild Things Are

Max imagines running away from his mom and sailing to a far-off land where large talking beasts—Ira, Carol, Douglas, the Bull, Judith and Alexander—crown him as their king, play rumpus, build forts and discover secret hideaways.

Where to watch

Where to watch No Game, No Life: ZeroWhere to watch Where the Wild Things Are

More like No Game, No Life: Zero · More like Where the Wild Things Are · Compare other titles