No Tears in Hell vs Red Dragon
Red Dragon has the higher audience score (7/10 against 5.2/10 for No Tears in Hell). No Tears in Hell is the shorter watch at 1h 41m compared with 2h 4m. Red Dragon is the older of the two (2002 against 2025). Both are crime, horror movies, so they suit a similar mood.
No Tears in Hell
Red Dragon| No Tears in Hell | Red Dragon | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.2/10 | ★ 7.0/10 |
| Year | 2025 | 2002 |
| Length | 1h 41m | 2h 4m |
| Genres | Crime, Horror | Crime, Horror, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Michael Caissie | Brett Ratner |
| Main cast | Luke Baines, Princess Elmore, Tatjana Marjanovic, Gwen Van Dam, Audrey Neal | Anthony Hopkins, Emily Watson, Mary-Louise Parker, Ken Leung, Philip Seymour Hoffman |
Synopsis
No Tears in Hell
In the frozen darkness of an Alaskan winter, a mother and son turn their home into a house of nightmares — luring victims into a twisted web of abuse and cannibalism. Based on the terrifying true story of Russian serial killer Alexander Spesivtsev.
Red Dragon
Former FBI Agent Will Graham, who was once almost killed by the savage Hannibal 'The Cannibal' Lecter, now has no choice but to face him again, as it seems Lecter is the only one who can help Graham track down a new serial killer.
Where to watch
Where to watch No Tears in HellWhere to watch Red Dragon
More like No Tears in Hell · More like Red Dragon · Compare other titles