No Tears in Hell vs Saw
Saw has the higher audience score (7/10 against 5.2/10 for No Tears in Hell). Saw is the shorter watch at 10m compared with 1h 41m. Saw is the older of the two (2003 against 2025). Both are crime, horror movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| No Tears in Hell | Saw | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.2/10 | ★ 7.0/10 |
| Year | 2025 | 2003 |
| Length | 1h 41m | 10m |
| Genres | Crime, Horror | Crime, Horror, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Michael Caissie | James Wan |
| Main cast | Luke Baines, Princess Elmore, Tatjana Marjanovic, Gwen Van Dam, Audrey Neal | Leigh Whannell, Paul Moder, Katrina Mathers, Dean Francis |
Synopsis
No Tears in Hell
In the frozen darkness of an Alaskan winter, a mother and son turn their home into a house of nightmares — luring victims into a twisted web of abuse and cannibalism. Based on the terrifying true story of Russian serial killer Alexander Spesivtsev.
Saw
David, an orderly at a hospital, tells his horrific story of being kidnapped and forced to play a vile game of survival.
Where to watch
Where to watch No Tears in HellWhere to watch Saw
More like No Tears in Hell · More like Saw · Compare other titles
No Tears in Hell
Saw