Nothing But the Truth vs The Silence of the Lambs
The Silence of the Lambs has the higher audience score (8.3/10 against 7/10 for Nothing But the Truth). Nothing But the Truth is the shorter watch at 1h 48m compared with 1h 59m. The Silence of the Lambs is the older of the two (1991 against 2008). Both are drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Nothing But the Truth
The Silence of the Lambs| Nothing But the Truth | The Silence of the Lambs | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 8.3/10 |
| Year | 2008 | 1991 |
| Length | 1h 48m | 1h 59m |
| Genres | Drama, Thriller | Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Rod Lurie | Jonathan Demme |
| Main cast | Courtney B. Vance, Julie Ann Emery, Vera Farmiga, Kate Beckinsale, Angela Bassett | Anthony Hopkins, Jodie Foster, Brooke Smith, Tracey Walter, Anthony Heald |
Synopsis
Nothing But the Truth
When reporter Rachel Armstrong writes a story that reveals the identity of a covert CIA operative, the government demands that Rachel reveal her source. She defies the special prosecutor and is thrown in jail. Meanwhile, her attorney, Albert Burnside argues her case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Silence of the Lambs
Clarice Starling is a top student at the FBI's training academy. Jack Crawford wants Clarice to interview Dr. Hannibal Lecter, a brilliant psychiatrist who is also a violent psychopath, serving life behind bars for various acts of murder and cannibalism. Crawford believes that Lecter may have insight into a case and that Starling, as an attractive young woman, may be just the bait to draw him out.
Where to watch
Where to watch Nothing But the TruthWhere to watch The Silence of the Lambs
More like Nothing But the Truth · More like The Silence of the Lambs · Compare other titles