Nowhere to Run vs Speed 2: Cruise Control
Nowhere to Run has the higher audience score (6.4/10 against 4.6/10 for Speed 2: Cruise Control). Nowhere to Run is the shorter watch at 1h 34m compared with 2h 5m. Nowhere to Run is the older of the two (1993 against 1997). Both are action, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Nowhere to Run
Speed 2: Cruise Control| Nowhere to Run | Speed 2: Cruise Control | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.4/10 | ★ 4.6/10 |
| Year | 1993 | 1997 |
| Length | 1h 34m | 2h 5m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Romance, Thriller | Action, Adventure, Drama, Romance, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Robert Harmon | Jan de Bont |
| Main cast | Kieran Culkin, Rosanna Arquette, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Ted Levine, Tiffany Taubman | Temuera Morrison, Sandra Bullock, Willem Dafoe, Royale Watkins, Colleen Camp |
Synopsis
Nowhere to Run
Escaped convict Sam Gillen single-handedly takes on ruthless developers who are determined to evict a widow with two young children.
Speed 2: Cruise Control
A disgruntled former employee hijacks the Seabourn Legend cruise liner. Set on a fixed course, without any means of communication and at the mercy of the hijacker, it's up to the one cop on vacation, and his soon to be fiancé (hopefully) Annie, to regain control of it before it kills the passengers and causes an environmental disaster. Insurmountable and daunting tasks await them on their perilous journey throughout the ship trying to fend off…
Where to watch
Where to watch Nowhere to RunWhere to watch Speed 2: Cruise Control
More like Nowhere to Run · More like Speed 2: Cruise Control · Compare other titles