Out of Sight vs Soft Shoes
Soft Shoes has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.7/10 for Out of Sight). Soft Shoes is the shorter watch at 46m compared with 2h 3m. Soft Shoes is the older of the two (1925 against 1998). Both are comedy, crime, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Out of Sight
Soft Shoes| Out of Sight | Soft Shoes | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.7/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 1998 | 1925 |
| Length | 2h 3m | 46m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime, Romance | Comedy, Crime, Romance, Western |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Steven Soderbergh | Lloyd Ingraham |
| Main cast | Don Cheadle, Steve Zahn, Ving Rhames, Dennis Farina, George Clooney | James Quinn, John Steppling, Francis Ford, Harry Carey, Lillian Rich |
Synopsis
Out of Sight
Meet Jack Foley, a smooth criminal who bends the law and is determined to make one last heist. Karen Sisco is a federal marshal who chooses all the right moves … and all the wrong guys. Now they're willing to risk it all to find out if there's more between them than just the law.
Soft Shoes
Sheriff Pat Halahan comes into an inheritance and travels to San Francisco to collect. Faith O’Day, a cat burglar armed with pistol and flashlight breaks into his hotel room and demands that Halahan cough up his dough. Halahan sees her threat and raises her a one-dollar bet that he can return a brooch she stole earlier the same evening before its loss is discovered. Pulling off his boots to slip on his own “soft shoes,” Halahan sets off to do a…
Where to watch
Where to watch Out of SightWhere to watch Soft Shoes
More like Out of Sight · More like Soft Shoes · Compare other titles