Out of Time vs The Silence of the Lambs
The Silence of the Lambs has the higher audience score (8.3/10 against 6.3/10 for Out of Time). Out of Time is the shorter watch at 1h 45m compared with 1h 59m. The Silence of the Lambs is the older of the two (1991 against 2003). Both are crime, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Out of Time
The Silence of the Lambs| Out of Time | The Silence of the Lambs | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 8.3/10 |
| Year | 2003 | 1991 |
| Length | 1h 45m | 1h 59m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama, Thriller | Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Carl Franklin | Jonathan Demme |
| Main cast | Sanaa Lathan, Eva Mendes, Denzel Washington, Dean Cain, Nora Dunn | Anthony Hopkins, Jodie Foster, Brooke Smith, Tracey Walter, Anthony Heald |
Synopsis
Out of Time
Matt Lee Whitlock, respected chief of police in small Banyan Key, Florida, must solve a vicious double homicide before he himself falls under suspicion. Matt Lee has to stay a few steps ahead of his own police force and everyone he's trusted in order to find out the truth.
The Silence of the Lambs
Clarice Starling is a top student at the FBI's training academy. Jack Crawford wants Clarice to interview Dr. Hannibal Lecter, a brilliant psychiatrist who is also a violent psychopath, serving life behind bars for various acts of murder and cannibalism. Crawford believes that Lecter may have insight into a case and that Starling, as an attractive young woman, may be just the bait to draw him out.
Where to watch
Where to watch Out of TimeWhere to watch The Silence of the Lambs
More like Out of Time · More like The Silence of the Lambs · Compare other titles