Paid in Full vs Undisputed III: Redemption

Undisputed III: Redemption has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.8/10 for Paid in Full). Undisputed III: Redemption is the shorter watch at 1h 36m compared with 1h 38m. Paid in Full is the older of the two (2002 against 2010). Both are action, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Paid in Full posterPaid in Full2002 VS Undisputed III: Redemption posterUndisputed III: Redemption2010
Paid in FullUndisputed III: Redemption
Audience score★ 6.8/10★ 7.5/10
Year20022010
Length1h 38m1h 36m
GenresAction, Crime, DramaAction, Crime, Drama, Thriller
CountryUnited States of AmericaUnited States of America
DirectorCharles Stone IIIIsaac Florentine
Main castChi McBride, Regina Hall, Wood Harris, Elise Neal, Mekhi PhiferMark Ivanir, Robert Costanzo, Hristo Shopov, Scott Adkins, Marko Zaror

Synopsis

Paid in Full

Ace is an impressionable young man working for a dry cleaning business. His friend, drug dealer Mitch, goes to prison. In an unrelated incident, he finds some cocaine in a pants pocket. Soon, Ace finds himself dealing cocaine for Lulu. Via lucky breaks and solid interpersonal skills, Ace moves to the top of the Harlem drug world. Of course, unfaithful employees and/or rivals conspire to bring about Ace's fall.

Undisputed III: Redemption

Russian inmate Boyka, now severely hobbled by the knee injury suffered at the end of Undisputed 2. No longer the feared prison fighter he was, he has declined so far that he is now good only for cleaning toilets. But when a new prison fight tournament begins - an international affair, matching the best fighters from prisons around the globe, enticing them with the promise of freedom for the winner - Boyka must reclaim his dignity and fight for…

Where to watch

Where to watch Paid in FullWhere to watch Undisputed III: Redemption

More like Paid in Full · More like Undisputed III: Redemption · Compare other titles