Primal Fear vs Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough

Primal Fear has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 4.9/10 for Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough). Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough is the shorter watch at 1h 27m compared with 2h 9m. Primal Fear is the older of the two (1996 against 2005). Both are crime, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Primal Fear posterPrimal Fear1996 VS Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough posterWild Things: Diamonds in the Rough2005
Primal FearWild Things: Diamonds in the Rough
Audience score★ 7.7/10★ 4.9/10
Year19962005
Length2h 9m1h 27m
GenresCrime, Drama, Mystery, ThrillerCrime, Drama, Mystery
CountryUnited States of America–
DirectorGregory HoblitJay Lowi
Main castJon Seda, Maura Tierney, Richard Gere, Alfre Woodard, Laura LinneyLinden Ashby, Claire Coffee, Brad Johnson, Eric Fleeks, Dina Meyer

Synopsis

Primal Fear

An arrogant, high-powered attorney takes on the case of a poor altar boy found running away from the scene of the grisly murder of the bishop who has taken him in. The case gets a lot more complex when the accused reveals that there may or may not have been a third person in the room.

Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough

Two young women will stop at nothing for one to gain a $4 million inheritance of two priceless diamonds, while two detectives try to thwart their plans, but find complications abound.

Where to watch

Where to watch Primal FearWhere to watch Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough

More like Primal Fear · More like Wild Things: Diamonds in the Rough · Compare other titles