Princes and Princesses vs Trace of Stones

Princes and Princesses has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 6.1/10 for Trace of Stones). Princes and Princesses is the shorter watch at 1h 10m compared with 2h 19m. Trace of Stones is the older of the two (1966 against 2000). Both are comedy, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Princes and Princesses posterPrinces and Princesses2000 VS Trace of Stones posterTrace of Stones1966
Princes and PrincessesTrace of Stones
Audience score★ 7.7/10★ 6.1/10
Year20001966
Length1h 10m2h 19m
GenresAdventure, Animation, Comedy, Drama, Family, Fantasy, Mystery, RomanceComedy, Drama, Romance
CountryFrance–
DirectorMichel OcelotFrank Beyer
Main castYves Barsacq, Philippe Cheytion, Arlette Mirapeu, François VoisinHans-Peter Reinecke, Manfred Krug, Krystyna Stypułkowska, Eberhard Esche, Johannes Wieke

Synopsis

Princes and Princesses

In this episodic animated fantasy from France, an art teacher interprets a series of six fairy tales (each involving a prince or princess) with the help of two precocious students. Princes and Princesses was created using a special style of cutout animation, with black silhouetted characters performing the action against backlit backdrops in striking colors.

Trace of Stones

Bad planning and shortages prevail on an East German construction site. Foreman Hannes Balla uses unconventional methods to overcome the problems. New Socialist Unity Party secretary Werner Horrath is charged with bringing the rough-and-ready builder crew into line. The task seems doomed to fail as the two men compete for the affections of young engineer Kati Klee. But when she gets pregnant by married man Horrath, he is in danger of being…

Where to watch

Where to watch Princes and PrincessesWhere to watch Trace of Stones

More like Princes and Princesses · More like Trace of Stones · Compare other titles