Princes and Princesses vs Where the Wild Things Are
Princes and Princesses has the higher audience score (7.7/10 against 6.5/10 for Where the Wild Things Are). Princes and Princesses is the shorter watch at 1h 10m compared with 1h 41m. Princes and Princesses is the older of the two (2000 against 2009). Both are adventure, drama, fantasy movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Princes and Princesses
Where the Wild Things Are| Princes and Princesses | Where the Wild Things Are | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.7/10 | ★ 6.5/10 |
| Year | 2000 | 2009 |
| Length | 1h 10m | 1h 41m |
| Genres | Adventure, Animation, Comedy, Drama, Family, Fantasy, Mystery, Romance | Adventure, Drama, Fantasy |
| Country | France | United States of America |
| Director | Michel Ocelot | Spike Jonze |
| Main cast | Yves Barsacq, Philippe Cheytion, Arlette Mirapeu, François Voisin | Paul Dano, Forest Whitaker, Chris Cooper, Mark Ruffalo, Catherine O'Hara |
Synopsis
Princes and Princesses
In this episodic animated fantasy from France, an art teacher interprets a series of six fairy tales (each involving a prince or princess) with the help of two precocious students. Princes and Princesses was created using a special style of cutout animation, with black silhouetted characters performing the action against backlit backdrops in striking colors.
Where the Wild Things Are
Max imagines running away from his mom and sailing to a far-off land where large talking beasts—Ira, Carol, Douglas, the Bull, Judith and Alexander—crown him as their king, play rumpus, build forts and discover secret hideaways.
Where to watch
Where to watch Princes and PrincessesWhere to watch Where the Wild Things Are
More like Princes and Princesses · More like Where the Wild Things Are · Compare other titles