Pulse vs Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 5.1/10 for Pulse). Pulse is the shorter watch at 1h 28m compared with 2h 15m. Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me is the older of the two (1992 against 2006). Both are drama, horror, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Pulse
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me| Pulse | Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.1/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 2006 | 1992 |
| Length | 1h 28m | 2h 15m |
| Genres | Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction | Drama, Horror, Mystery |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Jim Sonzero | David Lynch |
| Main cast | Ron Rifkin, Jonathan Tucker, Rick Gonzalez, Ian Somerhalder, Christina Milian | Pamela Gidley, Mädchen Amick, Miguel Ferrer, Heather Graham, Ray Wise |
Synopsis
Pulse
When the dead discover a means to contact the living through electronic devices, cellphones and computers become open gateways to monstrosities and destruction.
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
In the questionable town of Deer Meadow, Washington, FBI Agent Desmond inexplicably disappears while hunting for the man who murdered a teen girl. The killer is never apprehended, and, after experiencing dark visions and supernatural encounters, Agent Dale Cooper chillingly predicts that the culprit will claim another life. Meanwhile, in the more cozy town of Twin Peaks, hedonistic beauty Laura Palmer hangs with lowlifes and seems destined for…
Where to watch
Where to watch PulseWhere to watch Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
More like Pulse · More like Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me · Compare other titles