Raw vs Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 7/10 for Raw). Raw is the shorter watch at 1h 39m compared with 2h 15m. Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me is the older of the two (1992 against 2016). Both are drama, horror movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Raw
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me| Raw | Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 2016 | 1992 |
| Length | 1h 39m | 2h 15m |
| Genres | Drama, Horror | Drama, Horror, Mystery |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Julia Ducournau | David Lynch |
| Main cast | Ella Rumpf, Bouli Lanners, Laurent Lucas, Garance Marillier, Rabah Nait Oufella | Pamela Gidley, Mädchen Amick, Miguel Ferrer, Heather Graham, Ray Wise |
Synopsis
Raw
In Justine’s family everyone is a vet and a vegetarian. At 16, she’s a gifted teen ready to take on her first year in vet school, where her older sister also studies. There, she gets no time to settle: hazing starts right away. Justine is forced to eat raw meat for the first time in her life. Unexpected consequences emerge as her true self begins to form.
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
In the questionable town of Deer Meadow, Washington, FBI Agent Desmond inexplicably disappears while hunting for the man who murdered a teen girl. The killer is never apprehended, and, after experiencing dark visions and supernatural encounters, Agent Dale Cooper chillingly predicts that the culprit will claim another life. Meanwhile, in the more cozy town of Twin Peaks, hedonistic beauty Laura Palmer hangs with lowlifes and seems destined for…
Where to watch
Where to watch RawWhere to watch Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
More like Raw · More like Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me · Compare other titles