Real Gangsters vs The Silence of the Lambs
The Silence of the Lambs has the higher audience score (8.3/10 against 2.8/10 for Real Gangsters). Real Gangsters is the shorter watch at 1h 28m compared with 1h 59m. The Silence of the Lambs is the older of the two (1991 against 2013). Both are crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Real Gangsters
The Silence of the Lambs| Real Gangsters | The Silence of the Lambs | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 2.8/10 | ★ 8.3/10 |
| Year | 2013 | 1991 |
| Length | 1h 28m | 1h 59m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama | Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | US | – |
| Director | Frank D'Angelo | Jonathan Demme |
| Main cast | Michael Paré, Robert Loggia, Nick Mancuso, Margot Kidder, Sean McCann | Anthony Hopkins, Jodie Foster, Brooke Smith, Tracey Walter, Anthony Heald |
Synopsis
Real Gangsters
Real Gangsters tells the story of the Lo Giacamo family, one of the most successful crime syndicates in New York City. Run by cousins Vincent Lo Giacamo and Jack Lo Giacamo, Real Gangsters shows how these two men maintain control of their dangerous extended family and volatile business ventures by very different means.
The Silence of the Lambs
Clarice Starling is a top student at the FBI's training academy. Jack Crawford wants Clarice to interview Dr. Hannibal Lecter, a brilliant psychiatrist who is also a violent psychopath, serving life behind bars for various acts of murder and cannibalism. Crawford believes that Lecter may have insight into a case and that Starling, as an attractive young woman, may be just the bait to draw him out.
Where to watch
Where to watch Real GangstersWhere to watch The Silence of the Lambs
More like Real Gangsters · More like The Silence of the Lambs · Compare other titles